Ontario is getting ready to vote on whether to trade in its traditional First Past the Post electoral system for a Mixed Member Proportional scheme drawn up by an assembly of citizens this past year. Read their report here. While you're at it go see the MMP article in Wikipedia too, because there's a fair amount of jargon to be learned if you're going to discuss this stuff, plus some examples of how other countries have used and abused their proportional representation systems. (Italy scores high on the abuse side.)
If MMP passes, each constituency will elect a member as before, but now there will be a second ballot calling on the voter to designate a favourite party. Each party will get x number of extra seats depending on the results of this second ballot, which they will fill from a list of candidates submitted before the vote, to add to the number they have elected the old way until the party's total number of seats is in line with its popular vote. Sometimes a party will have maxed out its number of seats with constituency members, and sometimes a party will have only list members.
The upshot should be fewer majority governments, and more Greens.
And I'll probably vote for it. I'm trying not to be one of those people who's against everything. I voted for Meech.
I can think of a couple of problems. One is that under this plan the legislature would increase by 22 seats, reversing the Harris government's reduction, that one downsizing everyone could agree on. So, 22 new salaries, offices and pensions.
Candidates would be allowed to stand both in local elections and on the party list. Which means there will be cases of persons ascending to the legislature fresh from defeat in local elections. Imagine working to unseat an unpopular incumbent, and succeeding, only to have the guy enter the legislature through the back door of the party list. People will view it as a failure of democracy. Elections in Canada are as much about firing as hiring.
Suppose the unpopular incumbent comes in third behind the winner and an independent candidate who came second. The party list is by nature closed to independents, so that free-thinking individual would be SOL. We need more independents in the legislature, not fewer, but MMP puts an exclusive premium on party membership.
What if a person high up on a party's list gets into a fight with his party executive during the election? (For the sake of argument we'll call him Buzz.) Suppose they try to knock him off or down the list, and he takes them to court? Will a judge have the final say on the order of the party list, and consequently on who sits in the legislature? The voters themselves have no say on that. The party list is closed, not open, meaning the voters can't choose the order of the names.
Each party will be left to decide how to draw up its own list. So I'd expect to see everything from lottery winners to retired senators. Hm, that could be interesting.
Douglas